So, here’s how the Hoang and the Burdette are voting:
President
Curt: Undecided, but definitely not voting for Obama.
Giang: Undecided, but definitely not voting for Obama or McCain. Toying around with the idea of voting for Nader because at least he isn’t whoring himself out for a vote. This after Curt convinced me it is irresponsible to write in “Marlon Brando” just because I liked him in On the Waterfront.
Proposition 1: Bonds for a High Speed Rail?
Curt: YES, because he believes transportation infrastructure is paramount to economic growth. And he wants to go on a speedy train!
Giang: NO, because we should fix what we got before we go off building new-fangled trains. Who’s gonna use this train to get to work? And, they’ve spent $58 billion and gotten what done? And they want how much more? NO TRAINS FOR JOO!
Proposition 2: Allow Farm Animals to Lie Down, Stand Up, and Extend their Limbs?
Curt: NO, because it will make chicken and eggs more expensive.
Giang: YES, because I don’t care if chicken and eggs get more expensive. I feel bad when I go to the store and think about the chickens. Not bad enough to be a vegetarian (to my shame), but bad enough to give up a few dollars on eggs and chicken. Also, the arguments against it (Salmonella, Bird Flu) sound ridiculous to me. I don’t like it when people use scare tactics to try to win my vote. Show me proof!
Proposition 3: (More) Bonds for Children’s Hospital?
Curt: NO, because they just passed a bill for funds and have not used them.
Giang: NO, and ditto. 20% goes to the UC hospitals, and 80% goes to the private hospitals. The state, the country, everyone is in debt. We should not be funding private hospitals with more debt.
Proposition 4: Waiting Period and Parental Notification for Minors’ Abortions?
Curt: YES, because he is anti-abortion and because he believes parents should know if their daughters are getting abortions.
Giang: NO, because I am mostly pro-choice and the arguments for the YES vote are reflective of prurient interests rather than the reality. Making them tell you they are pregnant will not foster safe sex.
Proposition 5: Rehabilitation for Drug Offenses?
Curt: NO, because he believes the costs outweigh the benefits.
Giang: NO, because the law already allows for leniency if a first offender goes into drug treatment and stays clean. That’s a second chance. No third chances for you on my dime.
Proposition 6: More money for law enforcement vs. gangs and jails?
Curt: NO, because he believes it’s too costly.
Giang: NO, same reason.
Proposition 7: Renewable energy mandates for publicly-owned utilities?
Curt: NO as a matter of policy; he does not have a strong conviction either way, and votes NO when this occurs.
Giang: NO, because it is widely believed to be poorly drafted and set unrealistic goals. I will not read it myself, but defer to my fiscal instincts on this.
Proposition 8: Repeal gay marriage?
Curt: NO, because people should be able to do what they like.
Giang: NO, because if you vote for this, you are an asshole. You’re like that asshole kid with a cookie, who wants to keep other kids from having a cookie so you can stay the only kid who has a cookie. EVERYONE SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO HAVE COOKIES, ASSHOLE.
Proposition 9: Allow victim input during criminal justice process?
Curt: NO, because, and I quote, “Why do they need to be involved every step of the way?”
Giang: NO, because I honestly don’t have a strong belief either way here. NO on default.
Proposition 10: Bonds for alternative fuel vehicles and renewable energy?
Curt: NO, because people shouldn’t be compensated for going green.
Giang: HELL F-ING NO, simply because of the car rebate. It is not that I don’t believe in recycling and helping the environment, but this is just like that carbon offset credit bullshit. You behave green, or you don’t, you aren’t bribed into it, or buy into it to offset energy wasteful ways. NO. I am not paying anyone to buy a damned Prius, especially when: 1) The bonds we will end up paying for will cost more, and stay on California’s books as debt, longer than the cars will be in service and 2) Yarises are more economical and cuter. Go cute!
Proposition 11: Redistricting duties given to committee over legislators?
Curt: YES, because right now the legislators have the power to redistrict to their benefit and clearly that’s worked out well…
Giang: NO, because I am not satisfied that 14 random people screened by a State Auditor with blackball privileges given to the legislators is a better idea then letting the legislature do it. In fact, it could be disaster. I could be wrong, but I err on the side of caution. The devil you know…
Proposition 12: Keeping the Cal-Vet bonds?
Curt: YES, because people who risk their lives for their country can have $900 million dollars if they want it.
Giang: YES, and ditto. And it’s not like they’re a whole bunch of big-name multi-(billion/)millionaires who want a $700 billion dollar bailout for irresponsible lending.
Just sayin’.